It will be tested on people first, so I'll hold off until we see how that goes.
my mum and mum in law have both had there first jab
I must admit, I can see where you're coming from. Some vaccines take years to be approved. As I say, if there have been any negative developments by the time I am due to have it, I will give it a miss.I'll pass thanks.
I know it's a tweek on the SARS vaccine but I still won't have one. I won't be taking my chances on a vaccine that's been rushed through and made by a company who have agreed with the government that they cannot be held accountable for anything that goes wrong. Doesn't really fill me with confidence.
2 mum is 90 mum in law is 89. mum is due her 2nd one on the 6thWhat category do they fit in?
Did they say why?mum has just had her 2 jab canceled
Was it cancelled due to Covid? That would be like a mistic Meg convention being cancelled due to unforseen circumstances.mum has just had her 2 jab canceled
Did they say why?
I read that one jab offers protection for longer than was first thought, so they are planning to do more people with the first jab and will do the second ones later.
she was not told why. however i have since been told [ by a friend of a friend of a friend ] that the storage freezer brokeWas it cancelled due to Covid? That would be like a mistic Meg convention being cancelled due to unforseen circumstances.
mum has just had her 2 jab canceled
That's doesn't surprise me really. The first vaccine had to be stored at minus 70. It must surely be more difficult to maintain that reliably and such equipment is probably less abundant. The Oxford Astrazeneka one can be stored in a normal fridge.she was not told why. however i have since been told [ by a friend of a friend of a friend ] that the storage freezer broke
Indeed, there seems to be differing information on how the figures are compiled and can be interpreted.I have a foot in both Camps, and confused, I have a suppressed immune system due to a NON alcohol related liver transplant ( I have auto immune system hepatitis) My Liver consultant in the uk cannot give me a finite answer if what's left of my immune system could actually make use of what the jab will try to instruct it to do, I am in contact with my Italian surgeon who works in France his advice was simular, but he said he would go with the vaccine with caution?? what ever that would mean, he is a little worried that the Governments have given the supplying companies immunity from any prosecution, but due to suffering blood clots in my small bowel back in July he thinks I may have has Covid with no other symptoms, this drags up another question, is it actually Covid that all the scientists think it is? As been said the current idea is to tweak the Sars virus to let the immune system know what to attack, Confused I am!! I have been trawling the net trying to find evidence either way, I did find the item below that is from the Government's own Notifiable Contagious Disease page on the net, unfortunately I cannot post the link as it wont let me, so I took a screenshot, first one is where to look if you want to have a look yourselves. UA after some towns confused me but it turns out it means Unitary Authority View attachment 161859View attachment 161860, you have to find that pdf and scroll to page 14, it does appear to me that the government are basing their figures on the faulty tests and not Hospital admissions?