User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: The relevance of engine displacement

  1. #1
    Premier Users
    Points: 148,709, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    OverdriveTagger First ClassThree FriendsCreated Blog entryVeteran100000 Experience Points
    Awards:
    Frequent Poster

    The relevance of engine displacement


    AmericanThunder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Swindon, UK
    Posts
    10,309
    Points
    148,709
    Level
    100
    Total Contributions For

    AmericanThunder     £ 15.00
    Avg. Time Online
    1 Hour 10 Minutes 43 Seconds
    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    vBActivity - Stats
    Points
    22,426
    Level
    41
    vBActivity - Bars
    Lv. Percent
    70.12%

    The relevance of engine displacement

    Has anyone ever noticed how even different manufacturers come up with engines of the same size?
    It's rare one breaks the mold and announces something different.
    So for example, Ford, Chevy and Pontiac had 400ci (6.6l).
    Chevy, Pontiac & Dodge had 350ci (5,7l)
    Both Chevy & Dodge have settled on 6.2 for their supercharged engines.
    And in the UK, 1.6, 1.8, 2.0 and 2.8 are common from most manufacturers.
    So why?
    I'm sure the answer is bore vs Stroke and square vs under/over square along with configuration and packaging constraints. But perhaps there is more too it? Why did/do so many manufacturers lineups feature a 5.7 or 1.6 offering? Or perhaps they have done in the past - I can think of many engine sizes from bygone years that no longer feature today.
    Thoughts?
    Last edited by AmericanThunder; 21-09-2017 at 13:07.

  2. #2
    Forum Admin
    Points: 9,807,782, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    Three FriendsVeteranCreated Album picturesCreated Blog entryOverdriveTagger First ClassYour first GroupRecommendation First Class

    The relevance of engine displacement


    TransAmDan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 1999
    Location
    Waterlooville, Hampshire
    Posts
    13,938
    Points
    9,807,782
    Level
    100
    Total Contributions For

    TransAmDan     £ 5.00
    Avg. Time Online
    2 Hours 18 Minutes 26 Seconds
    Blog Entries
    32
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    vBActivity - Stats
    Points
    112,419
    Level
    76
    vBActivity - Bars
    Lv. Percent
    74.22%
    Mustangs seem to have smaller engines, like 5.0l, or do they have a 4.2l?
    I guess there is an optimum bore vs stroke. But there are soo many different sizes, although probably less now than before. A lot of manufacturers using the same engine even in every day cars. Like an Alfa using the same engine as a Vauxhall Vectra. I guess that helps with parts supply standardising on the same platform.

    2000 Trans-Am WS6 LS1 M6. (The Bat)
    Corsa Cat back, 3.5" dual tips. F.A.S.T LSX Intake / F.A.S.T Fuel rails, Dynatech LT Headers / Y-Pipe / No Cats, Wisper Lid, ported MAF, Racetronix 42lb/hr fuel injectors. Hypertech 160 stat. !AIR, !EGR. Walbro 255, SPEC Stage II Clutch / Flywheel. HPTuners 1BAR SD Tune. Wide Band gauge.
    389RWHP/380RWTQ ([477HP/460TQ]Flywheel) Dyno Dynamics

    More info and photos at:-
    http://www.solent-renegades.co.uk/co...-trans-am.html

  3. #3
    Premier Users
    Points: 148,709, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    OverdriveTagger First ClassThree FriendsCreated Blog entryVeteran100000 Experience Points
    Awards:
    Frequent Poster

    The relevance of engine displacement


    AmericanThunder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Swindon, UK
    Posts
    10,309
    Points
    148,709
    Level
    100
    Total Contributions For

    AmericanThunder     £ 15.00
    Avg. Time Online
    1 Hour 10 Minutes 43 Seconds
    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    vBActivity - Stats
    Points
    22,426
    Level
    41
    vBActivity - Bars
    Lv. Percent
    70.12%
    Yes , optimum bore vs stroke is the square configuration I referred too.
    You are quite right, I had ignored the common platforms shared by lots of manufacturers and perhaps they even share some R & D?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •